- 30th Anniversary of Humanae Vitae - Message of the Holy Father
- With a Little Help From Our Friends - NFP, Marriage Prep. & the Bishops
- "A Proper Wedding Gift"
- To Teach or Not to Teach - NFP and the Unmarried
- Nagasaki Archbishop Blasts Birth Control Pill
- Federal Grant Awarded to Northwest Family Services
- Report from International Teen STAR Federation
- The International Association of Physicians for NFP
- NFP Around the World
Portrain of the Interessengemeinschaft für Natürliche Familienplanung (IGNFP) - Coordinators' Corner
Diocese of St. Cloud Wins Coverage of NFP Services from Blue Cross/Blue Shield - New Briefs
The message dated February 27 and delivered on March 2, 1998, was directed to Dr. Anna Cappella, Director of the Center for Study and Investigation on the Natural Regulation of Fertility, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome. In wishing the participants of the congress a fruitful study regarding the "Church's teachings on the truth of the act of love in which spouses co-participate in the creative action of God," the Holy Father also said that this act is "an expression of the mutual giving of the self of the spouses, a giving that cannot but be total, since the person is one and indivisible." With this in mind, John Paul II also underscored the illicit nature of contraceptives precisely because they break "the inseparable connection between the two meanings of the conjugal act, the unitive and the procreative, which . . . is inscribed by God Himself in the nature of the human being."
"The natural regulation of fertility can only be correctly understood within the logic of mutual giving between the man and the woman, and authentically lived as a qualified expression of a real and mutual communion of love and life," said the Holy Father. " It is worth emphasizing," he continued, "that the person can never be considered a means to reach an end; especially, never a means for pleasure. The person is and should be solely the end of every act."
The message concluded by noting that "it is necessary to make an effort, on the one hand, to spread knowledge about the scientific foundations on which natural methods for regulating fertility are based in the field of medicine, and on the other, to develop study and research on the nature of the biochemical and biophysical facts that accompany periods of fertility and make them recognizable, thus making the exercise of responsible parenthood easier and more certain.
Donna Dausman
At the recent DDP conference in Montreal, the question arose "Why isn't NFP a part of every marriage prep program?" As a long time NFP diocesan coordinator and more recent family life director, I would say it definitely should be. But rather than lamenting the negative, perhaps we should celebrate the positive. Those who have been part of the NFP movement for 15 or more years would, I think, say there's been a dramatic change in NFP's acceptance in general and specifically in marriage prep programs. In a recent survey of diocesan family life offices done by the NCCB Secretariat for Family, Laity, Women andYouth and the National Association of Catholic Family Life Ministers, from a long list if possible ministries of family life offices, the top three were first, marriage prep; second, ministry to the divorced, and third, NFP. Surprised? I'm sure a lot of us were!
A substantial part of the credit for the fact that NFP is more accepted by family life offices and more readily a part of marriage preparation, certainly goes to the ongoing work of the DDP with dioceses and a variety of diocesan programs. In our own diocese, Endorsement through the DDP's National Standards was directly responsible for adding credibility to our program and making NFP more acceptable for parish marriage prep programs.
But shouldn't the bishops be strongly recommending NFP as part of marriage prep? They do. In their document, Faithful to Each Other Forever, A Catholic Handbook of Pastoral Help for Marriage Preparation issued by the NCCB Committee for Pastoral Research and Practices (1989), the bishops provide practical ideas and suggestions for fleshing out the concepts of remote, proximate, and immediate marriage preparation from Familiaris Consortio. Some recommendations from the document pertinent to our ministry are:
Indeed, given current cultural conditioning and the fact that virtually all couples begin marriage using some form of family planning, we urge that premarriage programs require a full course of instruction in natural family planning as a necessary component in the couple's effective realization of what they need and have a right to know in order to live in accord with the clear teaching of the Church. NFP instructors often note a change in perception among those required to learn NFP prior to marriage: 'We would never have taken this course if it had not been required, but now we're glad we did.'
We praise, in a particular way, couples who are sharing their experiences of natural family planning with others preparing for or already married, and we salute those who are teaching this method of responsible parenthood. This is a unique, predominantly 'like to like' ministry in the Church today, and persons engaged in instructing others in NFP deserve every possible support in that vital task.'
Thanks Friends!
Theresa Notare
Weddings are usually occasions for great joy. But I confess that for me they often cause anxiety. Naturally, I am happy for the blessings of others. My anxiety is rooted in the dilemma of choosing a proper wedding gift. By "proper," I mean a gift to truly honor the sacramental reality of the event. I want to give something that helps the couple live well their covenant in Christ. Given my interests and responsibilities, that means classes in Natural Family Planning (NFP).
Despite my good intentions, I have not yet had the nerve to do so. I hesitate to intrude on the couple's privacy. And so my anxiety--knowing that most newly married couples have a fairly misguided understanding of sexuality. Our culture promotes myths about sexuality, myths capable of wreaking damage upon single people and even tearing apart marriages.
What sexual myths? The central idea is that sexual intercourse is simply a value-free, pleasurable activity (as long as no one is coerced). Sex is portrayed as a need (like breathing), an uncontrollable drive, and even a sport. It is spoken of only as a means to self-fulfillment, instead of being directed toward one's partner.
There are two blemishes in this airbrushed image of sex--fertility and disease. The former is seen as something to suppress, the latter as something to avoid (but not by avoiding sex). Subconsciously accepting these myths, many couples have sexual intercourse without marriage and many approach marriage with a history of several sexual partners. It doesn't register that promiscuity before marriage makes fidelity to one person in marriage difficult.
Today's engaged couples are also often "expert" in the use of contraception (and if they are not, they think they should be). Most couples have so well accepted contraception that to tell them it's wrong or even unhealthy sounds bizarre. If you qualified the statement by saying that contraception is unhealthy on a psychological and spiritual level, they truly would not know what you are talking about. Yet, they need to know the truth. If couples want to build strong, lasting marriages--and most do--they need to know what will help them. The rich teachings of the Church on human sexuality, conjugal love and responsible parenthood need to be explained and integrated into their lives. Couples should be challenged to see the negative impact of sex without marriage. They need to understand that contraception will adversely affect their relationship with each other and with God.
Contraception does not exist to welcome another person into the world. It is intended to prevent the coming into being of another person. Its action is to separate, or suppress. Contraception is not family planning--it is family avoidance. That is radically different from being a good steward over one's fertility and co-operating with God and His design to space and limit births in a marriage. The latter perspective honors God as author of life, the former does not.
Couples who use contraception might ask themselves if the physical action of avoidance, separation, and suppression exist on other levels (e.g., emotional or spiritual)? And if they do, how does this affect their relationship? This is a very reasonable question. Physical acts express and affect our very being.
When cultural myths deny the strong emotional bond created by sexual relations, what results? When sex is transplanted from the structure of the original human relationship--marriage--where are we heading individually and socially? When the baby is not welcomed, what does that say about the kind of people we are? How can we grow in generosity and selflessness in a vacuum?
Today, the Catholic Church is the only major Christian body which teaches that contraception is wrong (although only sixty years ago, most Protestant denominations taught the same). The Holy Father speaks of the true nature of human sexuality when he writes that it "manifests its inmost meaning in leading the person to the gift of self in love" (Evangelium vitae, #97). This means that human sexuality has an "other" orientation, a spousal or family meaning. To remove this meaning from sex is to trivialize sex, and contribute to a "contempt for new life" (EV, #97). Pope John Paul II underscores the age-old Christian teaching that life must be respected from the conjugal embrace when he writes that, Natural Family Planning recognizes "all individuals" (including the child) in its methodology and promotes decision making "guided by the ideal of the sincere gift of self" (EV, #88). "Only a true love is able to protect life" (EV, #97).
NFP allows us to live our beliefs. It encourages a sexual spirituality in married life. In striving to be "open" to new life, spouses choose their mutual goal--to have God be the architect of the design for their family. By practicing periodic abstinence when trying to avoid or postpone pregnancy, couples can take a careful look at how they love each other. They can become conscious of trying to approach every aspect of life without covetousness or domination. There is no room for greed and exploitation when one lives chastely, because chastity consists in the long-term integration of one's thoughts, feelings, and actions in a way that values, esteems, and respects the dignity of the created order, others, and oneself.
This does not just happen after one NFP class! It is a life style that takes a life-time. It is also the approach to married life that helps couples perdure. God's gift of sexuality is a most proper wedding gift. It is what the Church invites us to accept and what the Catholic community should offer to those beginning married life.
Dr. Kevin Hume
A recurring question which often faces the NFP teacher is what to do with the couple who comes for NFP instruction and is living together but not married? Do we send them away and tell them to come back when they get married? Or, do we teach them? Dr. Kevin Hume, Secretary of the Worldwide Organization of the Ovulation Method-Billings International Inc. (WOOMB), says by all means "teach these couples!", and here's why . . . . .
It is one of WOOMB's objectives that every woman in the world should be given the information about her fertility which instruction in NFP provides. In the various international meetings of the UN, that is what our delegates taught in Cairo, Copenhagen, Istanbul, and Rome. At UN headquarters in 1994, I even managed to get the message across in a five minute plenary session slot. We at WOOMB are thus committed to teaching the Billings Ovulation Method (BOM) to anyone who will listen. We will even train them as teachers, but we will only accredit those who accept our philosophy.
Here at Waverley Family Centre (founded in 1969) many of the client couples are in de facto situations--very typical of the Australian situation. Seventy percent of them have been on the Pill and a smorgasbord of other contraceptives. As Dr. Hanna Klaus has said, practicing BOM and absorbing its underlying philosophy will either make them or break them (the de factos that is). They either will decide to marry or their unstable, genitally-based relationships will be blown apart.
In the countries of Central America and the Caribbean, amongst the poorer classes, marriage is the exception. Children are welcomed but they come from a series of fathers. Fr. William Gibbons, MD, Fr. Denis St. Marie, and Sr. Francesca--none of course who were on the method--taught hundreds of these de facto couples who entered the World Health Organization's five country trial of BOM in the late 1970's. They had found, that as a result of their teaching, many of the de facto couples had their natural marriages solemnized (to the surprised delight of the local bishop). As a bonus, these couples brought their children along to the ceremony to be baptized!
In the international community BOM has its critics (those with a contraceptive mentality), who allege that BOM is "too pro-baby." Certainly we have an increased proportion of couples who are coming to us for help in achieving a pregnancy--praise the Lord! At UN conferences we have rightly claimed that we are not only empowering women but also promoting responsible parenthood, a linchpin of the Church's teachings in this area of life.
Finally, if we take a look at what is happening in China we can see that the BOM has been a stunning success. It has been promoted by the Billings and a team of super-teachers (note, Family of the Americas has also been involved in teaching OM in China) who have devised a simplified method of charting suited to the local condition. The Chinese have not challenged our philosophy. Couple motivation to avoid pregnancy is very strong (remember, an unauthorized pregnancy means a forced abortion). The alternative to NFP is sterilization or the abortifacient IUD (in 80% of the cases). BOM has triumphed in effectiveness, safety, and in continuation rates. Some may question the moral licitness of the use of BOM in China as a permanent method of avoiding pregnancy. In my opinion the use of the method in these circumstances is morally licit because the practicing of the method meets the criteria laid down by the Church; i.e., there are serious reasons (already enumerated), for its use. Finally, we have not lost hope that the government's one child policy will change. Meanwhile, the fertility of our couples is preserved intact--ready for at least one more child when the climate changes!
Rev. Anthony Zimmerman
The Archbishop of Nagasaki, Japan, where descendants of martyrs practiced their faith secretly during centuries of persecution, advised the Japan Welfare Ministry to not approve the Pill for contraceptive purposes in Japan. The decision about approving or disapproving the Pill should not be based on medical findings alone, he urged. The rule for human behavior, individual and social, is moral rectitude, he pointed out. God has enjoined man to "increase and multiply" in the context of marriage in which man and woman are joined in love. "Whereas using the Pill for contraception, and employing any kind of artificial contraceptive method, expresses an attitude of denial and refusal toward a life which is to be born." Archbishop Shimamoto continued,
Archbishop Shimamoto published his report in the October 1997 issue of Pro-Life News, whose editor is Fr. Jerome Novotny, OMI. The monthly News is sent to the parishes and Catholic institutions of Japan, and to a number of non-Christian institutions and doctors. The effects of this sudden trumpeting of the Church's no-compromise ban on contraception may be dramatic in Catholic circles, where a practical "conspiracy of silence" has been the norm. Several telephone calls to the present writer by faithful supporters of the Magisterium were ecstatic in their praise of the article.
The Archbishop noted that the Mainichi newspapers had reported on August 13, 1997 that the Welfare Ministry had postponed a decision about approving the contraceptive Pill; the decision, (which was to be made at the end of 1997), would be conditioned upon the results of a study of possible medical side-effects suffered by Pill users. A report was also to be reviewed at the session of the pertinent Welfare Ministry Committee which was scheduled for the end of October 1997 (no word yet as this article goes to print).
In the meantime Catholic doctor Francis K. Hirata of Nagoya showed to Welfare Ministry members an extensive amount of data on the side effects of the Pill provided by the American pharmacist, Lloyd J. Duplantis, P.D., of Gray, Louisiana. A practicing pharmacist, a sharp critic of the Pill, he and his wife are familiar faces in USA Pro-Life circles. He is President of the over 1,200 member Pharmacists for Life. In his curriculum vitae he states:
Any time a person became ill or had untoward side-effects from any other drug, the product was discontinued and the reaction or problem was addressed. In the case of Oral, Implant, or Injectable Contraceptives, most often the chemical was continued and other drugs or pharmaceutical were added in an attempt to alleviate the problem.
This strange clinical practice, unique only to this class of drugs, was the catalyst that caused me to begin my research, interviewing hundreds of women and amassing statistics and studies pertinent to this topic over the last twenty years.
The Ministry of Welfare specialists showed great interest in the data of Dr. Duplantis. They asked for more, especially on a possible connection of the Pill with AIDS. Dr. Duplantis maintains that the Pill abets AIDS in the USA in two ways: oral contraceptives are steroid-base chemicals and therefore create an immune-compromising situation which makes individuals more susceptible to infections of all kinds. OC users have a three-fold increase of HIV infections over non-users. Second, sexual promiscuity exploded in the wake of the Pill in the USA. OC's are promoted to prevent pregnancy among sexually active singles, and among them the incidence of Pelvic Inflammatory Disease (PID) and other sexually communicated diseases has skyrocketed.
Dr. Hirata had in the meantime invited Dr. Duplantis to lecture in Japan on November 30-December 5th, 1997. When the Japan Conference of Bishops heard about this through Bishop Nomura of Nagoya, Cardinal Peter S. Shirayanagi of Tokyo and the entire Conference gave full support to this initiative. The Bishops' Committee for the Family, chaired by Archbishop Shimamoto, backed the tour to maximize its visibility and effectiveness in the nation. Dr. Duplantis did a fine job of lecturing here and provided us with
first class materials. Dr. Hirata printed these materials, including
also data from the book by pharmacist John Wilks of Australia.
This data is now in the hands of Welfare Ministry people, the Bishops,
many Catholic doctors, and leaders of other religions in Japan.
Even if the ban on the pill is lifted, the opposition is now well
instructed and motivated against using it.
As this article goes to print, the issue of the birth control pill and Japan is just breaking. The Welfare Ministry Committee postponed its decision about lifting the ban on the Pill until sometime in March 1998. Please keep us in your prayers as we wait for their decision.
Cindy Bankston
The Youth Solutions project of Northwest Family Services received $200,352 for a one-year project to encourage teen abstinence. The grant was awarded through he federal Office of Adolescent Pregnancy Programs (OAPP).
The Youth Solutions project will work with Oregon schools to implement proven programs. It will include three components: the FACTS teen abstinence curriculum, the Promises abstinence drama, and peer leadership. The students who learned from the FACTS curriculum, developed under a previous OAPP grant, experienced a 45% lower transition rate into sexual activity than their peers who received the conventional sex education program. Promises, a 35 minute teen drama, sensitively portrays the consequences of teen sexual activity and models positive ways to handle sexual pressure. Over 5,000 Oregon students saw Promises last year. It is enacted by teens who personally believe abstinence is the best choice. As one actor stated, "If I can help one teen make the right choice, my time has been well spent." A teen leader component is the third element of the Youth Solutions project.
Rose Fuller, Executive Director, comments, "We are delighted to have the opportunity to assist Oregon students. Youth Solutions will be reaching 5,000 to 8,000 students ages 12 to 15 years with effective ways to practice abstinence. More and more teens want to abstain, but they don't feel like they have the support or skills to do so. A current practice is to provide abstinence education for sixth and even seventh graders, but little or no support for other students. In other words, the help seems to stop just when teens need it the most. Youth Solutions provides participating schools with the technical support to offer youth the best."
In 1995, 3,294 Oregon teens under 18 years old became pregnant and 2,081 gave birth. Rates of sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) among teens are now at epidemic levels. For example, human papillomavirus (HPV), an STD with 500,000 to 1,000,000 new annual cases in the U.S., is present in virtually all cases of cervical cancer. Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women, with 4,900 deaths in the United States each year. Will condoms protect teens from HPV? The National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Cervical Cancer, April 1 - 3, 1996 stated, "The data on the use of barrier methods of contraception to prevent the spread of HPV are controversial but do not support this as an effective method of prevention" (Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monograph, No. 21, 1996). The emotional pain associated with early teen sexual involvement is yet to be measured. As one brochure states, "There is no condom for the heart."
Youth Solutions provides positive choices so teens can have full lives and keep their options open. In addition to providing assistance to schools, Northwest Family Services provides family education programs for parents and their teens which promote a positive family environment and the support for teen abstinence.
Hanna Klaus, MD
Forty-three international and Polish Teen STAR teachers met in Konstancin near Warsaw April 8 - 12, 1997 and founded the International Teen STAR Federation. Representatives came from Canada, Chile, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and Zimbabwe. Other countries where programs have been implemented but could not send representatives include: Austria, Italy, and Cameroon. Szymon Grzelak, who heads the Polish Coordinators' team had arranged a solemn opening ceremony which was attended by representatives from the Ministry of Education, mayors of local municipalities where the program is offered, as well as the director of Family Life for the Polish Episcopal Conference. Participants shared their successes and concerns.
The core components of Teen STAR are: self-discovery of the body, together with the values of fertility which lead to norms which govern the responsible use of fertility; involvement of parents, confidentiality, personal interviews, acceptance of the philosophy of the program as a pre-requisite for competent teaching, outcome evaluation, and an integration of the Theology of the Body within Catholic religious settings. The group affirmed the developmental thrust of the program which leads to personal integration, as well as self-discipline.
Poblems which surfaced in discussion revolved around poor funding and the enormous competition from contraceptive provider programs. Dr. Gintautas Vaitoska, a Lithuanian psychiatrist from Vilnius and Sr. Nora Dennehy, RGS from CORA Services, Philadelphia, presented their insights on the psychology of abstinence and answered many questions about practical aspects of counseling.
The exchange of experiences was most helpful to all of the teachers who felt very much encouraged and renewed by the meeting. Plans are in process for the next meeting in 1999 with an East European meeting hoped for in 1998. All of us are encouraged to see that no matter where the program is offered, the response of the teenagers is similar and positive. Growth has been enormous in Poland, where over 500 teachers have been trained, and most are active in the programs; in Chile 140 teachers are instructing 2,000 students this year.
Heinz Hürzeler
When Dr. Albert Wick of Frauenfeld, Switzerland, attended a speech in his hospital on Natural Conception Regulation (NCR), he became so enthused that he immediately organized an international congress for NCR on June 14, 1986. At the end of that congress, the attending physicians decided to found an organization for NCR. Thus was born the International Association of Physicians for NFP (IAPNFP) on September 20, 1986 in Baar, Switzerland.
From the beginning, IAPNFP was constituted as an informal association of interested doctors. In 1989, they saw the need for a Statement of Principles. Once articulated, the members of IAPNFP realized that they could better spread the principles of their organization if they became a legally registered association. And so, on October 27, 1990, the Swiss Branch of the IAPNFP was founded. Their general assembly (GA) approved bylaws and elected an international Board of Directors in January 1991.
IAPNFP presented itself at the 1991 Congress of the International Federation for Family Life Promotion in Lüttich, Belgium. That participation raised the question of what exactly did it mean to advocate only NCR? Subsequent Board meetings were dedicated to solve that question. After a profound discussion at the GA on October 17, 1992, members unanimously passed the following revision of the bylaws:
The above revision of IAPNFP's bylaws has restricted membership; however, the restriction has invaluable advantages. It has removed confusion and ended disputes enabling the group to be more focused. With their testimony the members of the IAPNFP are able to prove that their attitude expresses an ideal which by no means is incompatible with good physician activity. Thus they might act as an incentive to other colleagues to achieve this ideal as well.
Counseling the couples needs more time than a physician usually can spend in his daily practice. He therefore has to rely on cooperation with NCR teachers. The IAPNFP cooperates in principle with all different methods of NCR. In Switzerland, the NCR groups joined to found an umbrella organization called, the Interessengemeinschaft für Natürliche Familienplanung (IGNFP; see following article). The IGNFP and the IAPNFP have a very fruitful cooperation jointly sharing a scientific session of their general assemblies.
According to its bylaws, the IAPNFP annually plans scientific meetings and public lectures. On September 25, 1993, Prof. H. Berger and Msg. K. Küng spoke about the encyclical Humanae vitae on the occasion of its 25th anniversary. On May 26 - 28, 1994, the IAPNFP and the Association of Swiss Catholic Doctors (VKAS), prepared together a congress entitled "Pregnancy--Birth--the--Child--Ethical Considerations." On October 21, 1995, we examined the role a doctor should play in the teaching of NCR, especially considering the demands of the NCR counselors. The IAPNFP celebrated its 10th anniversary on April 19, 1996, with Dr. J. Rötzer's Institute for Natural Conception Regulation Empfangnis (INER). Hundreds of NCR counselors attended. The various groups presented their individual ways of charting and interpreting the women's cycle and compared all the methods on real charts.
The IAPNFP also concerns itself with politics and society. Some of its members attended the 1994 Cairo World Conference on Population and Development and the 1995 Women's World Conference in Beijing. In cooperation with other Pro-Life movements they distributed highly appreciated information to participants from all over the world. The IAPNFP publishes declarations on important topics, mostly in the field of human reproduction, writes articles in magazines, etc. It has created a center of documentation which is also open to non-members. To do all this work and to get more political power, the IAPNFP has to rely on support and is looking for new members. You can help it, by spreading this information.
Portrait of the Interessengemeinschaft für Natürliche Familienplanung (IGNFP)--Switzerland
Heinz Hürzeler
In March 1985 the Interessengemeinschaft für Natürliche Pamilienplanung, (Community of Interests for Natural Family Planning; IGNFP), was founded in the Principality of Liechtenstein, Zurich, Switzerland. The Community took for its goal the propagation of NFP to the Swiss and the people of Liechtenstein. It is the parent organization of the four main NFP organizations of Switzerland, AVIFA, CAMEN, INER, and WOOMB. It is responsible for regrouping some 175 NFP teachers and cooperates closely with the International Association of Physicians for NFP (IAPNFP). It seeks to reach its goal by the creation of a coordination office, which:
In addition, the Community supports all information centers corresponding with its aims.
Prep. & the BishopsWe urge that in each formal premarriage program, a presentation on Natural Family Planning and fertility appreciation be in included as integral, not an optional, part of the schedule. This segment, after establishing the awesomeness of both female and male fertility, should contain a simple explanation of nature family planning, its comparable effectiveness, the contribution it can make to a couple's relational growth, testimony by couples practicing this method, and information about available instruction resources.
_________________________________
Donna Dausman is the Family Life Director for the diocese of Springfield, IL. She also serves on the NCCB's NFP National Advisory Board.
___________________________________________
This article first appeared in Life Issues Forum, a nationally syndicated column of the Secretariat for Pro-Life Activities.
______________________________________
Dr. Kevin Hume is the Secretary of WOOMB International, Inc. He will be one of the guest faculty at BOMA's August 1998 teacher training session in Colorado (see News Briefs, p. ).
The doctrine of the Catholic Church approves neither contraceptive acts, nor abortion, nor euthanasia. The reason is the exciting love for life in each and every human being. Love is the one and only fountain of human life. The love of God for man, the love between man and woman in marriage, their crystallized love in the form of new life come to birth. Parents then love this new life, brothers and sisters provide it with more love, many others envelop it constantly with still more love, and in this context the child grows to maturity. Such is the framework of love in which loving humans develop, and that is how they become independent human beings. Love, then, is the fountain of human life. God does not permit human life to be manipulated outside of a setting of accompanying love. For God is love.
During the beginning of my practice, I became acutely aware that there was a problem developing with drugs being promoted as contraceptives that was unique to that category of pharmaceuticals. Rather than promoting well-being, the women who were taking these chemicals in order to prevent pregnancy were experiencing a myriad of problems both physical and psychological. These were healthy women who were becoming "sick"; yet, the medical community was treating the problem different than the accepted standard.
____________________________________
Cindy Bankston is the Youth Programs Coordinator of Northwest Family Services; 4805 N.E. Glisan St., Portland, OR 97213; 503-215-6377.
___________________________________
Hanna Klaus, MD, is the director of the NFP Center of Washington, D.C. Contact: Dr. Klaus, Teen STAR, 8514 Bradmoor Drive, Bethesda, MD 20817-3810; Phone/FAX 301-897-9323.
The IAPNFP requires the physicians willing to become members to absolutely respect human life from conception, to promote NCR, and not use or prescribe contraceptives and abortifacients.
_____________________________________
Dr. Heinz Hürzeler is co-director of the Interessengemeinschaft für Natürliche Familienplanung (IGNFP)--Switzerland. For more information on the IAPNFP, contact: Dr. Heinz Hürzeler, NFP Association of Switzerland, CH-8775, Luchsinger, SWITZERLAND; 011-055-643-24-44; FAX: 055-643-24-81
_______________________________
Further information is available from the coordination office run by Anne and Heinz Hürezeler, P.O.B. 63, CH-8775 Luchsingen; 011-41-55-6432444; FAX, 011-41-55-6432481 or 6531153; E-Mail, huerzele@dial.active.ch.

![[home]](/prolife/issues/nfp/images/usccb_logo.gif)
